the latest luck:
A “Pink Hellhome” Of Our Own?

I’ve wondered for many years how James Carville and Mary Matalin do it.  I’m a politically liberal-minded woman, and while I strongly support every person’s right to their own set of beliefs, I can’t quite imagine crawling into bed at night to snuggle with a Bush-conservative.  Sure, that Bush-conservative deserves someone to snuggle with too, it’s just I don’t believe that someone should be me.

Sometimes I question whether this restriction on my dating prospects is foolish.  I mean James and Mary are literally the physical embodiment of the political spectrum, wrapped up in the same master bedroom.  Their marriage has worked for years, and they work in politics.

Here I am, not working in politics and having an opinion, which I assume may only be partly informed, and that half-baked opinion makes me twitch and taste bile when a conservative comes-a-courtin’.

So I got this e-mail the other day from TruBlu.  He sent a string of compliments.  I went to look at his profile.  He certainly was handsome!  Judging from some of the photos that were posted, he’s obviously a model (more of the catalog variety than the runway), and reading on I discovered that he is pursuing acting.  Uh-oh.  I love actors, but I find them hard to date.  Because, you see, the typical mantra of an actor trends toward “Me, Me, Me, Me, Me.  But enough about me.  What do you think about me?”  I know that’s a generalization, which is why I decided to look beyond it and respond.

Of course, there was one other thing I needed to look beyond.

He had written at the bottom of his profile, “Obama supporters need not apply”.

Still, I wrote him back:

thank you for the compliments.

you should know, while i’m not “applying” for anything, i am an obama supporter. since you took the time to point out that this is your deal breaker, thought full disclosure was of the essence…

To be honest, I believe I thought this would put a pin in it, but he wrote back.

Hello!
Well I do appreciate your full disclosure and honesty. I felt I needed to put up that disclaimer as I’ve found thru past experience that I just didn’t get along with Obama supporters as we shared different ideology. I’m not a big political fan, but after seeing what’s been going on, it’s very alarming to me and is only going to get worse.
If you like to put politics aside….I’m interested in learning more about you.

Your intellect is very appealing to me.

J.
I’m not an activist at all

I read this and think that J and I are equally as stupid.  We both have allowed our eyes to overrule our ideologies.  He likes my photos. That’s why he wrote.  I liked his.  It’s why I responded.  And here we begin this volley that is sure to become more and more heated as time progresses.  J is aware that he does not get along with liberals, and yet he is engaging.  I read this message, and I am certain his past experience will be our guide.  I don’t agree with what he believes and I know we’ll end up fighting about it.

But really what sealed it for me was the final sentence of his message.  This man is not an activist.  And to him this is a proud selling point.

I write him back and tell him that I think we would be best to honor the lessons of his past experience and that I find being active behind a cause that is meaningful and important to be an attractive trait in a partner.  Surely this would put the nail in the coffin.

It did not.  J responds again.  This time with a thirteen paragraph diatribe on the disagreeable politics and practices of Obama.  On and on he goes, where he will stop, nobody knows…

I’ll tell you where he stopped.  After all of that, he ended this e-mail with:

Aside from that, do you have another picture or two to share?

Oh do I ever!  Here’s one:

Dear J,

This is a photograph of the Pink Hellhole* in which James Carville and Mary Matalin live in their bizarro marriage.  They are much smarter than me, but also suffer from worse taste.  Perhaps this is why their marriage works?

This is what our future could look like.  If we had one.  Which we don’t.

*credit is due to Wonkette (and Paul Begala) for coining this bit of genius.

Share The Luck
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Add to favorites
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr
  • RSS

«                                                        »

  1. Natasha on Friday 26, 2010

    I love love love your response. Perfect answer to a 13 paragraph diatribe.

  2. jami on Friday 26, 2010

    HA! What a brilliant reply!

    I dated a fiscal conservative once and every time he started talking politics, I would just take my top off and distract him. We only dated for a couple of months because, damn it, I want to keep my shirt on!

  3. Tapatio es una salsa! on Friday 26, 2010

    HA! Loved your response. 13 paragraphs… there’s the crazy!

  4. linda on Friday 26, 2010

    Brilliant photo and reply. Trust your instincts. I agree, when you find someone who is like minded and supports his beliefs, that is a turn on. He’s out there. Maybe you should go to a rally yourself and find him.

  5. Jordan;-) on Friday 26, 2010

    I’ve started weeding out friends that are conservative Republicans. It’s not that I have anything against Republicans, I just have an issue with surrounding myself with stupid people. After asking a former friend exactly what about Sarah Palin she thought made her so qualified to be VP, her response was, “I don’t know, I just think she has really cute glasses and I like her hair….and I like the fact that she’s a Mom like me!” I knew then that we had nothing in common anymore.
    As far as Carville and Matalin go- when you look like him, you can’t be too choosy.
    Great post. My favorite so far.

  6. wiilly on Friday 26, 2010

    Great post. If dating is a board game you just moved ahead 6 spaces. Well done.

  7. Nicole on Friday 26, 2010

    You should send him a pic of a militant black panther with a huge afro burning an American flag :)

  8. Jessica on Friday 26, 2010

    I heart you. ‘Nuff said.

  9. HDub on Friday 26, 2010

    Zing! Love it.

  10. Kreuchella on Friday 26, 2010

    So Brilliant!! Carville and Matalin work because they thrive on the difference. It charges them up. But most of us don’t seek that kind of discord – especially with someone who doesn’t even have the grace to come from the starting point of “agree to disagree”.

    He’s probably a Birther and a 9/11 truther too.

  11. Linzt on Friday 26, 2010

    There is a great short story on the topic by Steve Almond, “How to Love a Republican”

    http://www.stevenalmond.com/assets/stories/how_to_love_a_republican.html

  12. KB IN NYC on Friday 26, 2010

    Bada bing bada boom. Love it lady! One of your best and sassiest posts yet.

  13. Kelly on Friday 26, 2010

    I guess the whole conservative/liberal thing depends on what turns you on—some people like 24/7 debating. Personally, I would go mad. Mostly, I wonder who would be married to Glenn Beck.
    P.S. Thanks for the shot of the pink house—trippy, I never knew their tastes…

  14. DMN on Friday 26, 2010

    Lucky Girl, I see that ths guy contacted you first but it seems like you deliberately engaged the guy just so you could blog about it. Seems like a waste of your time.

    As for the Carvilles, I don’t see anything romantic or interesting about it. They are political mercenaries — epsecially for Mary, there’s very little substance to her political “philosophy.” She basically just picked a party like one picks a sports team and always roots for it even if it sucks or is losing. The fact that they can have a happy marriage (assuming they even do) is evidence of the shallowness of their politics, not evidence that “love conquers all.”

  15. Lucky Girl on Friday 26, 2010

    Thanks to ALL of you for reading and for your AMAZING comments!!!

    Linzt – I enjoyed that story – thank you for sharing.

    DMN -I’d like to address your comment in more detail.

    I absolutely did not engage this man so that I could blog about it. I NEVER do that. I am dating online because I am interested in and open to finding a partner. THAT is my first priority. I received a lovely e-mail from a man who was very attractive and had a reasonably interesting profile up to the point of stating that Obama supporters “need not apply”. If I hadn’t found him so incredibly attractive, then perhaps I would not have responded. But the truth is that I typically DO thank men when they write to compliment me, regardless of whether I am interested in them. In this case, given his politics, I assumed it would go no further than that, though I might have hoped that it would. When he responded, it became clear to me that we were not a match and I wrote to tell him so. When he returned with an angry and insulting 13-paragraph political rant, I had the inspiration for this piece. I had found the humor in something that might otherwise have been hurtful. I don’t see that as a waste of my time at all. I very much enjoyed writing this piece. I’m sorry if you did not enjoy reading it. I can’t please everyone, as much as I might wish that I could.

    As for your take on the Carvilles, I obviously don’t know the intimacies of their marriage, only that it appears to have endured nearly 17 years, which is more than many can claim these days. I’m not sure I’d agree with your position on their shallowness of politics. In sticking with your sports team analogy, one doesn’t typically get to coach the New York Giants without the chops to do so. Granted, there are exceptions. Like how Sarah Palin clinched a nomination.

    Like you, I don’t believe that “love conquers all”. But I think maturity, effort, hard work and commitment might…

  16. DMN on Friday 26, 2010

    LuckyGirl, you misunderstood: Not the shallowness of poltics in general but the shallowness of THEIR politics. In other words, in my view, they don’t really believe in the policies they support. They just like to pretend to have substantive differences so they can debate on TV.

    As for you, yes, you place WAY too much emphasis on a guy’s physical appearance. Reading your earlier blog posts, I see you are willing to forgive nearly every other shortcoming if a guy’s pictures are hot enough. That’s fine if you are not looking for a serious relationship but I suspect that you are. Also, when your entire focus is on physical qualities, you are going to attract men who are equally interested only in the physical. The cheerleading on your blog, in my view, is not helpful to you. You need more critical comments.

  17. Lucky Girl on Friday 26, 2010

    I understood you perfectly, DMN, I just disagree with you.

    And I think perhaps you misunderstand ME if you think that my entire focus is a man’s physical appearance. If you’ve read through my earlier posts, then you have read of what traits I admire and seek and also of the occasions where I have accepted dates with men that I was not physically attracted to. Those dates led nowhere, despite my wishing they would, because I didn’t want to be sexual with them. Physical attraction and sex are of considerable importance to me in a relationship, something I’ve learned I will not compromise. I’m not looking for a textbook Adonis. I’m looking for someone who I FIND attractive, and what is attractive TO ME may or may not be attractive to someone else. Call it shallow, superficial, give it whatever name you need but I need to be attracted to my partner to have sex with him, and I need to have sex with him for him to be my partner.

    Finding a partner on-line is not a science. It is nearly impossible to tell who a person is from a profile. If you’ve read as you say you have, then you know that I fall easily for words, and have been left disappointed on more than one occasion because the physical attraction was absent. I am a busy woman. I have a challenging career, an active social and professional life and many responsibilities. I am trying to balance all of that with a dating life. That means that I simply can’t date every man that comes along. And so, I gamble with each prospect based on a combination of my reaction to their words AND their photos. I’m not going to get it right every time, or probably even most of the time. But it’s the best I can do with what I have available to me.

    And anyone who says they don’t care about physical appearance, male or female, is full of shit.